Custom software for growing businesses
Software that fits the way you work.
CoderCraft designs and builds the systems businesses run on every day — web, desktop and mobile. We can run and host the finished product for you, or hand it to your own development team.
Building custom software since 2003 · Web, desktop & mobile · Hosted by us or run by your team
Why custom wins
Software shaped to your work. Not the other way around.
Every workaround, every side spreadsheet, every “we just handle that manually” is the gap between the software you bought and the business you actually run. Closing that gap usually costs less than the licenses and lost hours you already pay for.
What you get
A system built around your process instead of a configuration of somebody else's. It works the way your team already describes the job, so getting people on it is a conversation rather than a training course.
What it costs
One scope and one number, settled before the work starts — and no per-seat licence that grows every time you hire. From there it is your call: an annual fee where we host, run and keep improving it, or a handover to your own developers.
Where custom pays for itself
Problems worth building for
No two systems we build look alike. These are the problems clients hire us for most often — a project might involve one of them or several. Which ones apply to yours is part of the conversation before anything gets built.
The process that sets you apart
The thing your business does better than anyone else is the exact thing no packaged product supports. So it ends up in spreadsheets, email and somebody's head.
The platform that fits the work
Not every system needs a phone app, and not every job gets done at a desk. The platform should follow the work rather than a template.
The back office nobody wants to buy twice
Permissions, history and reporting are what make a system trustworthy — and what packaged tools charge extra for.
Systems that talk to each other
The most expensive work in a lot of businesses is a person retyping what another system already knows.
One record instead of five copies
Data arrives from a vendor feed, a spreadsheet, an old system nobody wants to touch — and every source spells the same customer a different way.
A product of your own
Some clients do not want a tool for the business — they want the business to be the tool: a subscription product with customers of its own.
Security
The part nobody asks about until it matters
Some of this we build in by default. The rest we recommend based on what your system holds and who touches it — and we will tell you plainly which is which.
Single sign-on
Staff can use the accounts they already have — Microsoft Entra, Google Workspace or another provider — so there is no extra password, and access ends the day their employment does.
Two-factor where it counts
A second step at sign-in for administrators, and for anyone whose account can reach personal or financial records.
Access scoped by role
People get what their role requires and nothing more, narrowed further per person where the work calls for it.
Passwords kept out of the code
Keys and connection details live in an encrypted vault, not in a settings file that can be copied or emailed.
A record of who did what
Changes are logged with the person and the time behind them, so a question about a record has an answer.
Public forms that resist bots
Anything open to the internet is checked and rate-limited, because a contact form is the first thing anyone probes.
Least privilege in the database
The application account can read and write the data it needs and nothing more — it cannot alter the database itself.
Deletes you can take back
Removed records sit recoverable for a grace period before anything is destroyed for good.
Start here
Bring us the problem. Not the specification.
Some people arrive with a detailed spec. Most arrive with a pain point — the process that eats a day every week, the report nobody trusts, the two systems that will not talk to each other. Either is a fine place to start. In more than twenty years we have met very few problems that could not be solved with enough time and effort; the useful conversation is about which ones are worth solving first, and what that costs.